St. John the Evangelist, Sandymount
  • Welcome
  • Latest information: services, news and diary
  • Regular Worship
  • About St. John’s
    • Icon of St. John
    • Stations of the Cross
    • Information Leaflets about St. John’s
  • People at St. John’s
  • How to find us
  • Virtual Heritage Week 2020
    • The Church Architecture
    • Church Artifacts
    • Two Notable Clerics
    • The Parochial Hall
    • The Teaching Profession >
      • Charles Philip Coote Cummings
      • Convent of St. John the Evangelist
    • Artists at St. John’s
    • The World of Theatre >
      • Dame Sybil Thordyke
      • Ivor Earle
    • The Written Word >
      • Emily de Burgh Daly
      • Sir John Betjeman
    • Music and Song >
      • William Percy French
      • Cecil Grange McDowell
      • Vera Wilkinson
      • The Jellet Sisters
  • Virtual Culture Night 2020
    • A Church for Sandymount >
      • The Founder & St. John’s High Church Tradition
      • Disestablishment and the Creation of the church of Ireland
      • Turblulent Priests
    • The Revd. F.S. Le Fanu comes to St. John’s >
      • Early Protests at St. John’s
      • Le Fanu v Roberts
      • Le Fanu v Richardson and Others
      • No More Turbluence
    • The Revd. S.R.S. Colquhoun comes to St. John’s >
      • Protests Against Ritual and Ceremony at St. John’s
      • Further Charges against Fr. Colquhoun
      • Suspension November 1937
      • More Allegations
      • The Case of the Crucifix
      • After the Turbulence
    • St. John’s Today
  • Data Privacy Notice
  • Links
  • Contact us
THE CASE OF THE CRUCIFIX

The issue of the crucifix took longer to resolve. The petition to have it removed was turned down following a lengthy judgment from Archbishop Gregg stating that it was not an illegal ornament, and pointing out that it had been introduced under a former incumbent in 1925 with the approval of the then Archbishop; in these circumstances, it could not have been removed by Fr Colquhoun without express permission for which he was not obliged to apply. Therefore, it was not retained illegally by him.  

Prolonged litigation followed before the Court of the General Synod and the Diocesan Court, now presided over by the new Archbishop, Most Revd. A.W. Barton D.D.    Fr Colquhoun, John Wilson of Sandymount Road, C.V.S. Ireland of Mespil Road, Frank Gardner of Merrion View Avenue and Georgina French of Ailesbury Road, appeared on behalf of St John’s.  The opposers were Samuel Caithness of Guildford Road, William Chamney of Elgin Road and John Lowth of Merrion Square, all Vestry members. Mr Lowth argued that many local people refused to attend services at St John’s due to the presence of the crucifix and that the Select Vestry had passed a resolution opposing its retention.  However, Fr Colquhoun stated that he did not recognize the Select Vestry and had ‘never attended any meetings’ of that body. He also stated that the majority of worshippers desired the retention of the crucifix. 
 
The final hearing in October 1940 was at the Diocesan Court, to which the Court of the General Synod had remitted the matter to allow the Archbishop to decide upon it.  Archbishop Barton considered that there was no evidence that the crucifix was being used for ‘superstitious adoration’ and in view of the fact that the incumbent and the majority of worshippers at St John’s wished its retention, and without setting any precedents, he deemed it reasonable to give his approval for the crucifix to remain in the place that it had occupied for many years.
Picture
Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.